SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 73

M.K.HANJURA
Rinku Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Gagan Basotra
For the Respondents: Mr. Asheesh Singh Kotwal

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioners dispute the result of the investigation and the allegations levellled against them in the charge sheet on the grounds inter alia, that they got married to each other. Both of them had attained the age of majority at the time of this marriage. The petitioners proceed to state that since the marriage was an inter-religious one, it was resisted by the father of petitioner No. 2 and therefore, it was not safe for them to perform the rituals in the State of J&K as a consequence of which they performed the same at Gaziabad (U.P.) on 7.9.2015 where the petitioner No. 2 (bride) changed her faith into Hinduism and was named as Sonia Sharma. The copy of the marriage certificate the conversion certificate, it is stated, are attached to the petition as annexure-B. The petitioners also state that the marriage was registered in accordance with the statutory requirement of the State and the registration certificate was issued in favour of the parties in accordance with the Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration (Rules) 1973 dated 7.9.2015, a copy whereof is attached to the petition as annexure-C. It is further stated that the marriage between the petitioners did not augu


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top