M.K.HANJURA
Rinku Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
1. The petitioners dispute the result of the investigation and the allegations levellled against them in the charge sheet on the grounds inter alia, that they got married to each other. Both of them had attained the age of majority at the time of this marriage. The petitioners proceed to state that since the marriage was an inter-religious one, it was resisted by the father of petitioner No. 2 and therefore, it was not safe for them to perform the rituals in the State of J&K as a consequence of which they performed the same at Gaziabad (U.P.) on 7.9.2015 where the petitioner No. 2 (bride) changed her faith into Hinduism and was named as Sonia Sharma. The copy of the marriage certificate the conversion certificate, it is stated, are attached to the petition as annexure-B. The petitioners also state that the marriage was registered in accordance with the statutory requirement of the State and the registration certificate was issued in favour of the parties in accordance with the Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration (Rules) 1973 dated 7.9.2015, a copy whereof is attached to the petition as annexure-C. It is further stated that the marriage between the petitioners did not augu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.