SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 83

M.K.HANJURA
Neeru Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. U.K. Jalali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anuj Sawhney, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Chopra, GA.

JUDGMENT :

1. The Petitioner-Dr. Neeru Gupta in the instant petition filed under Section 561-A Cr.P.C implores for the grant of the following reliefs in her favour:-

“(i) Quash the order impugned passed by the learned Session Judge, Rajouri dated 05th August, 2011, as a consequence of which the order of the CJM, Rajouri has been upheld for reinvestigation of the case in FIR No. 403/08 under Section 338 of RPC.

(ii) Direct the closure of the case by accepting the report of I.O. based on opinion of Medical Board of Doctors.

(iii) Direct the concerned respondents to produce the entire record of the case before this Hon’ble Court.

(iv) Pass any other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the present case.”

2. The facts, as these emerge from the study of the file under consideration are, that the complainant, namely, Shri Tahir Shah filed a Complaint before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajouri (in brevity, the CJM) on 05th November, 2008, wherein he stated that his wife was pregnant. On the 12th of July, 2008,































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top