RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR
Suneeta Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Through the present writ petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs:-
(i) To set aside or quash the impugned order No.13-SWD of 2015 dated 22.04.2015 by issuing writ of mandamus;
(ii) To prohibit respondents from making an order of disengagement of the petitioners by issuing writ of probation; &
(iii) To release the monthly honorarium and regularize the services of the petitioners in terms of Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 by issuing a writ of mandamus.
3. Petitioner No.1-Suneeta Kumari claims that she was temporarily appointed as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Centre at Drubeel Proper purely on monthly honorarium basis as admissible under norms by the Child Development Project Officer, (I.C.D.S.) Inderwal vide order dated 07.08.2013 (Annexure-A at page 7), similarly petitioner No.2-Sahira Banoo claims that she was temporarily appointed as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Centre at Gagrimarh purely on monthly honorarium basis as admissible under norms by the Child Development Project Officer, (I.C.D.S.) Inderwal vide order dated 17.12.2013 (Annexure-A at page 8) and Petitioner No.3-Heena Banoo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.