IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR, J.
Suneeta Kumari & ors. - Petitioner
Versus
State & ors. - Respondent
SWP No.1070 of 2016 & MP No.01 of 2016
Decided On : 02-02-2018
Anganwadi Workers - Employment Dispute - Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 - Not specified
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, Anganwadi Workers, sought relief against an order terminating their temporary appointments and claimed entitlement to monthly honorarium and regularization of services under the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners' temporary appointments were subject to the condition that they could be engaged on a temporary basis until the posts were advertised and regular appointments made. The court held that the termination order was in relation to appointments made on stop-gap/adhoc arrangements without following established procedure.
Issues: Validity of termination order, entitlement to honorarium and regularization, and the legality of the selection process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the petitioners' temporary appointments were valid until regular appointments were made, and they were entitled to honorarium for the period worked. The court also emphasized that the selection process had to proceed in accordance with the law.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Competent Authority to consider the petitioners' rights within two weeks from the date of the order.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Through the present writ petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs:-
(i) To set aside or quash the impugned order No.13-SWD of 2015 dated 22.04.2015 by issuing writ of mandamus;
(ii) To prohibit respondents from making an order of disengagement of the petitioners by issuing writ of probation; &
(iii) To release the monthly honorarium and regularize the services of the petitioners in terms of Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 by issuing a writ of mandamus.
3. Petitioner No.1-Suneeta Kumari claims that she was temporarily appointed as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Centre at Drubeel Proper purely on monthly honorarium basis as admissible under norms by the Child Development Project Officer, (I.C.D.S.) Inderwal vide order dated 07.08.2013 (Annexure-A at page 7), similarly petitioner No.2-Sahira Banoo claims that she was temporarily appointed as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Centre at Gagrimarh purely on monthly honorarium basis as admissible under norms by the Child Development Project Officer, (I.C.D.S.) Inderwal vide order dated 17.12.2013 (Annexure-A at page 8) and Petitioner No.3-Heena Banoo also claims that she was appointed as Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Centre at Rahal Panchayat Inderwal-B purely on temporarily basis till the post is advertised and selection is made by the competent authority on monthly honorarium basis as admissible under norms by the Child Development Project Officer, (I.C.D.S.) Inderwal vide order dated 07.08.2013 (Annexure-A at page 9).
4. The petitioners claimed that they continued to work as such. After they have been performing the duties temporarily as above, it appears that the advertisement notice was issued which resulted in Child Development Project Officer, ICDS, Inderwal publishing a list of candidates, who had applied for the post of Anganwadi Workers in various Centres in Inderwal. At the same time on 22.04.2015, an order No.13-SMD of 2015 was passed by the Mission Director, ICDS J&K, which reads as follows:-
“Government of Jammu and Kashmir
STATE MISSION DIRECTORATE, ICDS, J&K
Hajj House, 3rd Floor, Rail Head Jammu
Subject: Termination of stop-gap/adhoc arrangements of Anganwadi Workers/Helpers.
O R D E R No. 13 SMD of 2015
DATED: 22.04.2015
In compliance to the directions issue by the Administrative Department conveyed vide No.SWD/ICDS/55/2015 dated 17.04.2015, all stop gap/adhoc arrangements of Anganwadi Workers and Helpers who have been made without established procedure are hereby terminated with immediate effect.
The Drawing and Disbursing Officers shall not entertain any claims of wages of such engagements. The compliance report in this behalf shall be submitted to this Directorate within a week’s time along with the list of such disengaged persons.”
5. The writ petitioners have filed the present writ petition to quash Order No.13-SMD of 2015 dated 22.04.2015 stating that the termination order passed by the Mission Director is bad. Based on the pleadings of the petitioners, an interim order was passed on 30.05.2016 based on an earlier interim order passed by this Court on 01.03.2016 in MP No.01/2016 in SWP No.358/2016, which reads as follows:-
“Meanwhile, subject to objections from the other side and till next date before the Bench, status quo, as on today, with respect to the present position of the petitioners, shall be maintained.”
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners pleads that by an order (Annexure-B) dated 22.04.2015, services of all the Anganwadi Workers are sought to be disturbed by the Mission Director whereas according to counsel for the petitioners, they are working on the basis of the orders (Annexure-A) passed by the Competent Authority/Child Development Project Officer, Inderwal on temporary basis on monthly honorarium. It is not illegal order but it is subject to the condition that as and when the post is advertised and selection is made by the Competent Authority, they can be engaged on
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.