Ramesh Kumar Wattal, J. (Member)

1. The case is discussed under the following heads:-

1. Memorandum of Revision petition

2. Arguments of the petitioner

3. Arguments of the Respondents

4. Decision

Memorandum of Revision Petition

The petitioner has presented this Revision petition on the grounds;

1. That the land measuring 118 kanals 3 marlas comprising khasra No. 1 [34 kanals], khasra No. 17 (37 kanals 11 marlas) and khasra No. 18 (46 kanais and 12 marlas) of Village Channi Rama was owned by Kapoor Singh and other owners. This land was under the occupancy tenancy of Kanshi Ram and Nasher Din S/o. Chaghatta was in cultivating possession thereof; on coming into operation the Big Landed Estates Abolition Act. The owners Kapoor Singh and others and occupancy tenants Kanshi Ram did not include this land in their units of selection under Big Landed Estates Abolition Act, 2007. Mutation No. 121 of village Channi Rama was thereafter attested in favor of the state. It is worthwhile to submit here that rights of Nasher Din who was non occupancy tenant in possession of said land were completely ignored while attesting mutation No. 121 of Village Channi Rama.

2. That vide award No. LA/669-70,