SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 359

SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Gurnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sudershan Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Narinder Kumar Attri.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Khajuria.

JUDGMENT :

1. In the instant petition filed under Section 561-A Cr. P.C. petitioners seek quashment of the order dated 10.5.2014 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Kathua, by virtue of which the revision petition filed by the petitioners against the order dated 12.2.2014 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Kathua, in a petition for calling expert report with regard to the amount figured and name written as Sudershan Kumar Gupta in cheque no. 7677310 dated 17.1.2007, has been dismissed.

2. In this petition, it has been stated that order impugned is against the law and facts of the case, thereby causing miscarriage of justice. Courts have failed to exercise the jurisdiction, as such; the same deserves to be quashed. That cheque, if entrusted to somebody in blank as security and any inscription thereon by a person entrusted with cheque does amount to misappropriation of property, so order of courts below are illegal. That M/s Chowdhary Enterprises was sealed by Punjab National Bank on 10.11.2005 and cheque in question pertains to Cheque-Book issued in 2001, as such, it becomes more important as to who inscribed the cheque.

3. I have considered the submission. Pet


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top