SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Molvi Allah Ditta – Appellant
Versus
State th. SHO P/S Surankote – Respondent
1. Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the impugned order dated 27.10.2017, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Poonch in the criminal trial entitled State vs. Molvi Allah Ditta and ors, whereby the learned Judge has disallowed the petitioner’s application seeking to place on record two admitted documents to be used during cross examination of the witness and exhibited in evidence.
2. The said order reads as under :-
“From the perusal of the statement of PW Mohd Sadiq he has admitted during his cross-examination that he has written these two applications and admitted his signatures on these two applications. The third application on which the case is registered against the accused persons is annexed with the challan file. Counsel for the defenced has simply mentioned in his application only for cross-examination the PW Mohd Sadiq who is the complainant in the case about the writing of these two applications and the defence counsel has not submitted in his application that firstly he be permitted to annexed these two applications in the record of the challan and then he allowed to cross-examine the witness. The statement of the said PW
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.