SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 242

M.K.HANJURA
Mohammad Nayeem – Appellant
Versus
State of JK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr Musavir Mir, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr B. A. Dar, Sr. AAG.

JUDGMENT :

1. The sequence of events, as these emerge from the study of the file, under consideration are that the petitioner got married with a woman, namely, Monica Devi (Asma) daughter of Bharat Singh R/o Maligam, Ramban. It is stated that she is 19 years of age and, on 3rd of November, 2017, she entered into a wedlock with the petitioner out of her free will and volition. It is further pleaded that, after their marriage, they lived peacefully as husband and wife. It is also stated that this marriage did not augur well with the respondent Nos. 3 and 4. They got annoyed and are bent upon to cause undue interference in the peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioner and his wife. The petitioner and his wife were threatened by the said respondents and were forced to leave their house. It is also contended that the said respondents have lodged a false and frivolous case against them at Police Station, Ramban. They have filed a petition under Section 561-A in which the Investigating Agency has been directed to ensure that the directions issued by the Court are not flouted. The petitioner has proceeded to state that the respondents took his wife from the Court premises and confined her

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top