1. The fascicule of the facts, necessitous and apropos to fathom the background of the present writ petition, based whereupon a case has been set in motion and the present controversy built, has its genesis and origin to the envisioning of the claim of the petitioner since treating him not with similarly situated persons and co-petitioner in SWP no.373/2012, namely Dr Mohammad Younis, has put him in uncertainty and melancholy. It is the inertia of the respondents in treating the petitioner dissimilar and not vouchsafing him the akin benefits bestowed upon co-petitioner in SWP no.373/2012, that has forced him to knock at the portals of this Court with the writ petition on hand.

2. The petitioner pleads that he is working as a Consultant Surgeon and is posted in the JLNM Hospital as Super Specialist (DNB) Urology. In the year 2012, he was selected for the super-specialty training course at the Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Ahmedabad. For undergoing the said course, he implored for grant of study leave. Dillydallying in consideration thereof, forced the petitioner and another similarly situated person, namely, Dr Mohammad Younis, to move the writ petition,