TASHI RABSTAN, SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
Tashi Rabstan, J.
1. Review Petitioner (respondent No.3 in LPA no.32/2018) is seeking review/recalling/setting aside of judgment and order dated 31.05.2018, passed by this Court in LPA No. 32/2018 titled “Vinod Kumar Gupta v. State of J&K and others”, by virtue whereof said appeal, filed by appellant-respondent No.3 herein, has been disposed of with a direction to official respondents to proceed in the matter strictly in terms of Government Order No.132-PDD of 2018 dated 15.05.2018 and to that extent order of learned Writ Court was modified.
2. Review petitioner claims that by order No.37-DCP of 2018 dated 27.04.2018, he was transferred and adjusted in place of appellant (respondent No.3 herein). In compliance to order dated 27.04.2018, he joined the office of Executive Engineering Electric M&RE Division, Kathua. By order dated 01.05.2018, he was adjusted in the office of Assistant Executive Engineer, Store, Sub Division, Kathua, and he, accordingly, submitted his joining report on 01.05.2018.
3. Mr. Salathia, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Review Petitioner, has stated that appellant-respondent No.3 herein, in order to harass Review Petitioner, filed a wr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.