Sanjeev Kumar, J.

1. This order shall dispose of the application filed by applicant seeking review of the judgment dated 02.07.2018 passed by this Court in SWP No.1029/2015.

2. The writ petition SWP No.1029/2015 was allowed by this Court on 02.07.2018 holding the promotion granted in favour of the applicant-respondent No.2 as Reader by virtue of order dated 27.07.2009, impugned in the writ petition, not justified in law. This Court also quashed the promotion of the applicant as Reader granted by the High Court vide its order dated 27.07.2009. It may be noted that in paragraph No.39, in place of “Reader” the “Bench Secretary” has been written due to typographical error. Non-applicant No.1 has moved a separate application seeking correction of the aforesaid clerical error which shall be dealt with separately.

3. Mr. R.A. Jan, learned senior Advocate, appearing for the applicant, while elaborating the grounds on which the review is sought submits that the judgment sought to be reviewed is vitiated due to several errors apparent on the face of record. It is submitted that under Rule 6 of the High Court Staff (Condition of Services) Rules, 1968, the Chief Justice is empowered to