SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 692

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SANJEEV KUMAR, J.
Tarvinder Singh and others - Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others - Respondent
SWP No. 1050 of 2017, IA No.02 of 2017
Decided on : 17-10-2018

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M/s A.S.Azad and Kamal Gupta, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG

The main legal principle established in the judgment is that eligibility for recruitment is determined based on the law at the time the selection process is initiated, and subsequent amendments do not govern the selection process.

Headnote:

OBC Caste Lawana - Recruitment of Constable (GD) - Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004, Gazette Notification dated 07.12.2016 - The court discussed the eligibility of candidates under the OBC category based on the OBC certificates issued by the competent authority under the State Reservation Rules, and the inclusion of the caste 'Lawana' in the Central List of OBCs on 07.12.2016. The court highlighted the relevant terms and conditions of the Advertisement Notification, the cut-off date, and the requirement for the caste to be enlisted in the Central List of OBCs. The court emphasized that eligibility for recruitment is determined based on the law at the time the selection process is initiated, and subsequent amendments do not govern the selection process.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, candidates belonging to the Lawana Caste, participated in a recruitment process for Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) in the State of Jammu and Kashmir as OBC candidates. They were initially considered under the OBC category but were later found ineligible due to their caste not being enlisted in the Central List of OBCs at the time of the recruitment process.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners were not entitled to consideration as OBC candidates in the selection process based on the OBC certificates issued in their favor by the competent authority under the State Reservation Rules, as their caste 'Lawana' was declared as OBC by the Central Government after the cut-off date and during the pendency of the selection process.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to consideration as OBC candidates in the selection process based on the OBC certificates issued in their favor by the competent authority under the State Reservation Rules, despite their caste 'Lawana' being declared as OBC by the Central Government after the cut-off date and during the pendency of the selection process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that eligibility for recruitment is determined based on the law at the time the selection process is initiated, and subsequent amendments do not govern the selection process. It highlighted the requirement for the caste to be enlisted in the Central List of OBCs and the significance of the cut-off date in determining eligibility.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the court found no merit in the petitioners' claim to be considered under the OBC category for the recruitment process.

JUDGMENT :

1. An Advertisement Notification was issued by the respondent No.2 on 27th of July, 2016 for recruitment of Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) through recruitment rallies in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The petitioners along with others participated in one of the recruitment rallies for border district of Rajouri as OBC candidates. The petitioners are candidates belonging to Lawana Caste which is treated by the Central Government as “OBC” in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The petitioners appeared before the Regional Selection Board at Rajouri for Physical Standard Test and Physical Endurance Test (PST/PET for short) on respective dates. They were considered in the recruitment process as OBC candidates. All of them qualified the PST/PET and were permitted to sit in the written examination. The petitioners were even shortlisted and subjected to medical and review medical examinations. All the five petitioners were found medically fit. They were even found making the grade under the category of OBC but it appears that during preparation of final merit list, testimonials of the petitioners including their OBC certificates were subjected to verification. During verification process, it was found that the petitioners belonged to “Lawana” caste which was not enlisted in the Central List of OBCs at the time of publication of Advertisement Notification. The caste “Lawana” came to be included in the Central List of OBC for the first time vide Resolution No.12011/6/2014-BC-II dated 06.12.2016, which was duly published in the Central Govt. Gazette Notification dated 07.12.2016 published by the Ministry of Social, Justice and Empowerment. It is on account of the aforesaid reason, the petitioners were not found to be eligible for consideration under the OBC category for the post of Constable (GD) notified for selection on 27.07.2016. The petitioners though had made it to the select list under OBC category but were denied the appointment for the aforesaid reason. The petitioners, feeling aggrieved, have come up before this Court by way of instant writ petition. The petitioner, are thus seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners under OBC category and appoint them as Constable (GD) with all consequential benefits.

2. Per contra, the stand of the respondents in the objections is that neither on the date of Advertisement Notification nor on the cut-off date, the petitioners’ caste “Lawana” had been declared by the Central Government as OBC and, therefore, the petitioners were not entitled to be considered under the said category. The respondents have, however, admitted that the petitioners in view of their merit and physical fitness have made it to the select list under OBC category but the fact remains that the petitioners were not entitled to be considered as OBC candidates and therefore, could not be offered the appointment. The respondents have invited a reference to the various terms and conditions of the Notification to substantiate their stance.

3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record, the undisputed scenario that emerges is that the petitioners had applied under OBC category having been issued the requisite certificates by the competent authority under the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004 and the Rules framed thereunder. They were permitted to participate in the selection process as OBC candidates. All of them successfully cleared the PST/PET, the written examination and were also found fit by the Medical and Review Medical Boards. In short, all of them made the grade for recruitment as Constable (GD) under OBC category. In view of this admitted factual matrix, the only question that needs determination in this case is:-

“Whether the petitioners were entitled to consideration as OBC candidate in the selection process in question on the basis of the OBC certificates issued in their favour by the competent authority under the State Reservation















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top