SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(J&K) 42

GITA MITTAL, TASHI RABSTAN
Sapco India – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Appearing Counsel:
For the Petitioner(s):Mr. Subash C. Dutta and Mr. Suraj Singh Wazir, Advocates
For the Respondent(s): Mr. K.D.S. Kotwal, Dy. AG

Judgment (Oral)

1. With the consent of the parties, this writ petition is taken up for consideration.

2. We have heard Mr. Subash C. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.D.S Kotwal, learned Dy. AG on behalf of the respondents on this writ petition seeking the following prayer:—

“(i) Allow this writ petition of the petitioner; ii) Issue writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No.2 to issue the refund along with interest @ 18% P.A.”

3. The facts giving rise to the present writ petition within narrow compass are that the writ petitioner is a partnership concern engaged in the purchase and sale of cement and other iron goods and material in Jammu. For this business, the petitioner was registered as a dealer with the Assessing Authority Sales Tax Circle J, Jammu. It appears that with regard to GST returns of the petitioner for the accounting period 1993-94, the assessment was effected under Section 7(8) of the J&K General Sales Tax Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as “J&K GST Act”) on 28th of August, 1995. Sub
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top