SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 909

R.SUDHAKAR
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Jakfed – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
D.S. Chauhan, Adv., Kanav Gupta, Adv., Adarsh Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

R. Sudhakar, J.

Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner seeks the following relief-

“For the reasons as submitted above the petitioner most humbly prays for the issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari quashing No. 49-JAKFED of 2015, dated 23.02.2015 as passed by the respondent.

AND

With a further prayer of issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent to consider and offer employment/appointment to the petitioner against permanent post with regular pay scale thereto.”

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is son of Late Ram Kumar, who was working as Salesman/Junior Assistant in the respondent-department and died in harness on 04.10.2011. He sought for compassionate appointment in terms of SRO 43 of 1994. Since the claim was not considered, the petitioner was forced to file the writ petition bearing SWP No. 1107/2014, which was referred to Lok Adalat Bench and in that, an award was passed, which reads as follows:-

“The respondent shall consider the case of the petitioner for appointment under SRO 43 within a period of six months under rules.”

2. The meaning and intend of the award is very specific that the responde









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top