SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 910

SANJEEV KUMAR, M.K.HANJURA
State of J&K – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Tayoub Leharwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Fayaz Ahmad Mir, Dy. Adv
For the Respondent:Mr. B.A. Bashir, Sr. Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Kumar, J.

Respondent No. 1 approached this Court through the medium of SWP No. 2488/2012 seeking, inter alia, a direction to the appellants herein to consider his case for being appointed as Junior Yatchman. He sought consideration of his case on the analogy of one Sh. Sonaullah Buhroo who, as claimed by respondent No. 1, was appointed as Senior Yatchman under similar set of circumstances. This petition was disposed of by a learned Single Judge of this Court vide its judgment dated 01.03.2016 by directing the appellants to consider the case of respondent No. 1 for his adjustment against the available post of Junior Yatchman on the analogy of Sh. Sonaullah Buhroo. The decision in this regard was directed to be taken within a period of one month from the date copy of the judgment was served upon the appellants. The judgment aforesaid, however, was not implemented by the appellants despite the lapse of more than one month as stipulated in the judgment, the petitioner moved before the learned Single Bench of this Court by way of a contempt petition registered as Contempt(SWP) No. 103/2017. On being put on notice, the appellants appeared and filed their statement of fac























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top