SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(J&K) 654

B.S.WALIA
Pankaj Dayal – Appellant
Versus
Vijay K. Sondhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.N. Ratanpuri, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Mr. B.S. Walia, J.

Vide this order, three petitions bearing 561-A Cr. P.C. Nos. 15, 16 and 17 of 2016 between the same parties, are being decided. Narration of facts is from 561-A Cr. P.C. Nos. 16 of 2016.

2. Brief facts of the case are that three criminal complaints i.e. No. 8615, 8616 and 8617 of 2015 were filed by the respondent against the petitioner in the Court of the Magistrate 1st Class (Sub Registrar), Srinagar u/s 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and on the basis of the same, the petitioner stands summoned. Summoning order is not on the record. However, copy of the complaint has been placed on record in each of the cases.

3. That as per averments in the petition, the petitioner allegedly borrowed a sum of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- (Rs. One crore fifty lacs) from the respondent in the year 2011 under an agreement to repay the same as per agreement, that allegedly a notice of demand was issued on 07.10.2015, which was duly served upon the petitioner but was not responded to, leading to institution of a complaint u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 before the Court of the Magistrate 1st Class (Sub Registrar) Srinagar.

4. That the pr






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top