SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(J&K) 713

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Hasnain Massodi, B.S. Walia, JJ.
Arvind Sharma - Appellant
Vs.
State - Respondent
WP No. 1350 of 2011
Decided On : 27-11-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ankesh Chandel, F.A. Natnoo, V.R. Wazir, Sr. Advocate with Abhishek Wazir, Advocate
For the Respondents:R.A. Jan, Advocate General with M.A. Bhat, A.V. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Aditya Gupta, Sikander Khan, S.K. Shukla, Vipin Gandotra, S.S. Ahmed, Adarsh Sharma, Monika Bhagat, Advocates

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Gradation List and promotions based on it were unconstitutional and did not comply with the Reservation Rules of 1994 or 2005. The court also emphasized that promotions to the post of Civil Judge (Senior Division) should be made strictly on the basis of merit cum seniority as provided under J.& K. Civil Services (Classification, Control, Appeal) Rules, 1956.

Headnote:

Reservation in Promotions - Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission - Rule 31 of J.& K. Reservation Rules, 2005 - Rule 24 of J.& K. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners and respondents 3 to 16, 2003 Batch Judicial Officers, participated in the selection process for the posts of Munsiffs in the grade of Rs. 8000-12950. The High Court of J.& K. issued a Gradation List in 2010, affecting the seniority of the petitioners. The petitioners challenged the Gradation List and the promotions of respondents 3 and 4 based on their placement in the List, citing violations of Rule 31 of J.& K. Reservation Rules, 2005 and Rule 24 of J.& K. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Gradation List and promotions based on it were unconstitutional as they violated the spirit and mandate of Article 16 of the Constitution of India. The court also found that the Gradation List did not comply with the Reservation Rules of 1994 or 2005 and depicted non-application of mind and arbitrariness. The court held that the promotions to the post of Civil Judge (Senior Division) were beyond the purview of the Reservation Rules and should be made strictly on the basis of merit cum seniority as provided under J.& K. Civil Services (Classification, Control, Appeal) Rules, 1956.

Issues: The issues included the validity of the Gradation List, the promotions based on it, and the compliance with Reservation Rules of 1994 and 2005. The court also considered the constitutionality of the Reservation Rules and the promotions to the post of Civil Judge (Senior Division).

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Gradation List and promotions based on it were unconstitutional and did not comply with the Reservation Rules of 1994 or 2005. The court also held that the promotions to the post of Civil Judge (Senior Division) should be made strictly on the basis of merit cum seniority as provided under J.& K. Civil Services (Classification, Control, Appeal) Rules, 1956.

Final Decision: The court set aside the Gradation List and the promotions based on it. It directed the respondent to undertake an exercise to find out whether any posts of Civil Judge (Senior Division) were lying vacant and to consider the petitioners' promotion against available vacancies. If no posts were found vacant, the promotions of respondents 4, 5, 7 to 12 would stand set aside, and consideration would be accorded to the petitioners' promotion against the available vacancies.

JUDGMENT :

Hasnain Massodi, J.

Petitioners and respondents 3 to 16 are 2003 Batch Judicial Officers. They, responded under their respective categories, to the Advertisement Notice No. PSC/Ex-2001/64 dated 04.12.2001, issued by J.& K. State Public Service Commission, inviting applications from the eligible candidates for posts of Munsiffs in the grade of Rs. 8000-12950. They and other aspirants for advertised posts participated in the selection process and on the strength of merit secured, found placed in the select list issued by the J.& K. Public Service Commission. The merit position of petitioners, private respondents as also of other candidates as per the Merit List/select list issued by the Commission (Annexure (A) to the writ petition, was as under:

S. No.

Roll No.

Name of Candidate

Category

G Total (Marks)

1

-

Amerjeet Singh Langeha

RBA

646

2

049

Sandeep Kour

RBA

608

3

082

Amit Kumar Gupta

OM

604

4

014

Sandeep Gandotra

OM

603

5

064

Anoop Kumar

OM

597

6

154

Farooq Ahmad Bhat

OM

595

7

138

Shabeer Ahmad

OM

587

7A

-

Arvind Sharma

OM

-

8

202

Yash Paul

OM

573

9

020

Imtiyaz Ahmed Lone

OM

571

10

117

Amit Sharma

OM

570

11

011

Khursheed Ul-Islam

OM

569

12

034

Arti Mohan

OM

563

13

147

Lmi Kul Soom Mir

OM

561

14

107

Pawan Kumar Sharma

OM

559

15

141

Iqbal Ahmad Massodi

OM

558

16

072

Renu Dogra

SLC

554

17

079

Sudesh Sharma

OM

552

18

018

Spalzes Angmo

ST

550

19

042

Adnan Sayeed

RBA

541

20

100

Khem Raj

OM

541

21

201

Dinesh Gupta

OM

540

22

074

Parvaiz Iqbal

OM

539

23

165

Mir Afroz

OM

537

24

063

Prem Sagar

OM

536

25

016

Archana Charak

OM

535

26

160

Ab. Quayom Mir

OM

533

27

030

Manzoor Ahmad Zargar

OM

532

28

007

Yahya Firdoos Ahanger

RBA

531

29

098

Manoj Parihar

RBA

504

30

143

Muzaffer Iqbal Khan

LAC

503

31

013

Bashir Ahmed Munshi

RBA

494

32

025

Raja Mohammed Tasleem

ST

485

33

015

Manjeet Rai

SLC

480

34

058

Anjum Ara

RBA

475

35

002

Manzoor Ahmed Khan

LAC

460

36

181

Rajni Sharma

RBA

447

37

041

Madan Lal

SC

436

38

144

Ahsan Ullah Parvez Malik

RBA

429

39

146

Javed Ahmad Naik

RBA

408

40

121

Arun Kumar Kotwal

RBA

379

41

038

Vinod Kumar

SC

379

42

051

Sushil Singh

SC

369

43

039

Romesh Lal

SC

367

44

150

Mansoor Ahmed Lone

RBA

340

45

168

Mohd. Naseem

RBA

333

2. J.& K. Public Service Commission vide PSC/Ex-2002/KCS (Judicial) dated 09.05.2003 forwarded the list of selected candidates to respondents 1 and 2. The respondent No. 2 on receipt of the select list recommended appointment of selected candidates as Munsiffs in the pay scale of Rs. 8000-12950 in the Subordinate Judiciary. The selected candidates on their appointment ordered vide Government Order No. 1815-LD (A) of 2003 dated 06.08.2003 became members of J.& K. Civil Services (Judicial).

3. The High Court of J.& K. through its Registrar General - respondent No. 2 herein, issued Gradation List on 01.06.2010 wherein the private respondents though below petitioners in the order of merit notified earlier (Annexure A), were shown at a higher place and therefore, senior to the petitioners. Private respondents were allowed a jump in seniority position by 2 to 30 steps in the Gradation List. Resultantly, seniority o





























































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top