SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(J&K) 162

TASHI RABSTAN
Latief Ahmad Rather – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Appearing Counsel:
For the Petitioner(s):Mr Mir Shafqat Hussain, Advocate with Mr Wajid Haseeb, Advocate
For the Respondent(s): Mr Javed Iqbal, Sr. AAG

Judgment

1. This Court by Order and judgement dated 3rd August 2018, dismissed writ petition, bearing HCP no.15/2018 titled Latief Ahmad Rather v. State of J&K and others. Thereagainst, review petitioner herein directed an Appeal, being LPAHC no.08/2018. The Division Bench vide order dated 18th September 2018, dismissed aforesaid Appeal with liberty to petitioner to seek review/verification before learned Single Judge. It is as a consequence of this that instant Review Petition has come up for consideration before me.

2. I have heard learned counsel for parties and considered the matter. I have also gone through the judgement, review whereof is sought for.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner states that judgement dated 3rd August 2018 requires to be reviewed on following grounds:—

(a) Detenu was already in custody in FIR no.448/2013 and FIR no.263/2017;

(b) Relevant material was not placed before detaining authority, i.e. acquittal order of FIR no.216/2013;

(c) Detention order has been ordered for maximum period;

(d) Relevant material has





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top