RASHID ALI DAR
Mushtaq Ahmad Challoo – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Ayoub Challoo – Respondent
1. Conditional leave has been granted on 07.09.2017, in favour of the petitioner herein by the learned trial Court on an application filed under Order 37, Rule (3), sub-rule (5) of CPC. The learned trial Court had found the ground put forth for grant of leave to be illusory and sham and accordingly the petitioner has been directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 6,20,000/- in the Court or in the alternative deposit cash security.
2. A review petition was filed before said Court which has been dismissed in terms of order dated 23.01.2019, while opining no ground had been made out for the same. The approach of the learned Court is stated being not covered by the law and virtually according to the petitioner the defendant has been incapacitated to contest the suit. For this, Revisory jurisdiction under Section 115, C.P.C. and in the alternative Section 104, Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir is invoked.
3. A copy of the plaint has been brought on record by the learned counsel when he was being heard. It indicates a suit has been filed for an amount of Rs. 6,20,000/- by the respondent before trial Court on the count that:
(i) The plaintiff is a Managing partner of the Firm Northern Moto
Defiance Knitting Industries (P) Ltd. vs. Jay Arts
Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd. vs. Sukumar Mukherjee
IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. vs. Hubtown Ltd. (2017) 1 SCC 568
Laxmikant Revchand Bhojwani vs. Pratapsingh Mohansingh Pardeshi
Milkyram (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Chamamlal Bros
Southern Sales & Services vs. Sauermilch Design & Handels Gmb H. AIR 2009 SC 320
Shalini Shyam Shetty and Another vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.