JUDGMENT

Tashi Rabstan, J. - Through the medium of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking to quash Office Memorandum dated 17.08.2013 (annexure "J" to the writ petition) vide which financial up-gradation was granted to the petitioner under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme from 01.04.2011 instead of 2006. The petitioner is also seeking a direction to the respondents in the nature of mandamus for grant of financial up-gradation under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme from 2006 along with all consequential benefits including different allowances during the period 23.05.2000 to 14.02.2005, i.e., the intervening period of petitioner which is dismissal from service to reinstatement in service.

2. The facts in short, as averred in the writ petition, are that the petitioner was appointed as a Constable in CISF on 21.06.1994. He applied for leave on 27.12.1999 and the same was granted to him upto 30.01.2000. It is averred that during the leave period the petitioner fell ill and he applied for extension of leave from time to time and the same was extended by the respondents. It is averred that during the period of service, i.e., on 24.07.1999 some false and frivolous