SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(J&K) 37

SANJEEV KUMAR
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Th. Education Deptt – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Aseem Sawhney, AAG, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Vide advertisement notification No. 9 of 2010 issued by respondent No.3, applications were invited for engagement of RET Teachers in various zones of District Jammu which included two posts in Primary School Jhallar. Out of the two posts advertised one was earmarked for Mathematics stream and one for Science stream. Petitioner along with respondent No. 5 and other eligible candidates responded in the aforesaid notification and sought consideration against the post earmarked for Mathematics stream. A panel was prepared by respondents in which the respondent No. 5 was at serial No.1 whereas the petitioner at serial No. 2. On the basis of merit, respondent No. 5 was engaged as RET.

2. The engagement of respondent No. 5 as RET in Mathematics stream in the school aforesaid was assailed by the petitioner by way of instant writ petition primarily on the ground that Graduation degree relied upon by respondent No. 5 for seeking appointment as RET was fake. This Court vide order dated 14.12.2017, directed the Director School Education, Jammu to verify as to whether the degree possessed by respondent No. 5 was at all issued in her favour by the University concerned and whether resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top