SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(J&K) 274

SANJAY DHAR
Taro Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocate
For the Respondent(s): None

Judgment

Sanjay Dhar, J.—The petitioner has challenged order dated 09.09.2020 passed by learned Additional Mobile Magistrate, Samba, whereby the learned Magistrate has directed SHO, P/S Vijaypur to verify the matter and if cognizable offences are made out, to proceed in terms of Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. Petitioner is primarily aggrieved of the direction of the learned Magistrate to the extent it asks the SHO to verify the matter prior to proceeding in terms of Section 156(3) of Cr. P. C. According to the petitioner the learned Magistrate could not have delegated the power of verification to the SHO.

3. For appreciating the controversy at hand, it is necessary to notice the facts of the case.

4. It appears that the petitioner had filed an application under Section 153(6) of Cr. P. C before the learned Magistrate seeking a direction for registration of FIR. In the application it was alleged that at about 9. 30 a.m. on 29.08.2020, when the petitioner was working in her land measuring 16 marlas comprised in Khasra No.3 situated at Smball Wali Tehsil Vijaypur District Samba, the accused persons, armed with Dharatis and clubs, trespassed into the said land and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top