SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 122

SANJAY DHAR
Karanjeet Kour – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Appearing Counsel:
For the Petitioner(s):Mr. M. Tariq Mughal, Advocate
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Aseem Sawhney, AAG

Judgment

Sanjay Dhar, J.—The instant petition came to be filed by the petitioners seeking quashment of FIR No. 09/2017 dated 01.03.2017 for offences under Sections 498-A/406/109 RPC registered with Police Station, Women Cell, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu together with the challan pending disposal before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (City Judge), Jammu and the consequent proceedings initiated thereon by the learned Magistrate, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No.2 are legally wedded couple, whereas, petitioners No. 3 & 4 happen to be the parents of petitioner No.2, petitioner No.5 happens to be the brother of petitioner No.2, petitioners No.6 and 7 happens to be the maternal grandfather and grandmother of petitioner No.2 and petitioner No.8 happens to be the maternal uncle of petitioner No.2. According to the petitioners, after the solemnization of their marriage, relations between them got strained. This led to their separation giving rise to filing of a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act before the Court of learned JMIC/ Cit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top