SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(J&K) 646

SANJEEV KUMAR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Usha Rani – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vishal Sharma, ASGI
For the Respondents:Mr. R.K. Bhatia, Advocate

Judgment

Union of India and its functionaries are in appeal against the award dated 29th March, 2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jammu in Claim file No.534/C titled Usha Rani and others v. Suresh Chand and others, whereby respondent Nos. 1 to 4 (hereinafter “the claimants”) have been held entitled to compensation of Rs. 44,79,892/- along with pendente lite and future interest @ 7.5% per annum on account of death of one Sh. Avtar Singh.

2. The impugned award has been primarily assailed on quantum. It is submitted that amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal is exorbitant and excessive. The appellants have also made a feeble attempt to even dispute the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal on issue No.1. It is claimed that given the evidence on record, it had fairly come out that the accident involving the offending vehicle had occurred due to bad road conditions and not because of any negligence on part of the driver of the offending vehicle. This ground, however, is not pressed before me by learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, appearing for the appellants. His whole impetus was on the quantum of compensation awarded to the claimants. Relying upon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top