SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 200

SANJAY DHAR
SHOWKAT HUSSAIN KOUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. H. Naik, Mr. Zia, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. B. A. Dar, Sr. AAG.

JUDGMENT :

1) Petitioner has challenged FIR No.05/2016 for offences under Section 5(1)(d) r/w 5(2) and Section 4A of J&K Prevention of Corruption Act and 109 RPC registered with Police Station, Vigilance Organization Kashmir, Srinagar.

2) The facts emanating from the record are that pursuant to e-tendering, the work pertaining to construction and maintenance of road from Salamabad to Gohalan, Stage-II, Phase-VI, Package No.JK00-57, was allotted by Chief Engineer, PMGSY (JKRRDA), Srinagar, to M/S Jehangir Steel Industries, Awantipora, Kashmir, through its proprietor Jahangir Ahmad Bhat, who happens to be the complainant in the instant case. The work was allotted to the aforesaid complainant in terms of the letter of acceptance bearing No.CE/PMGSY/1886-92 dated 24.06.2010. As per the terms of the agreement pertaining to the allotment of contract, the work was to be executed and completed within a period of 18 months.

3) It appears that the work could not be completed by the contractor i.e., the complainant, within the stipulated time and he could not do so even within the extended p

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top