SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 322

SANJAY DHAR
Sheikh Gowhar Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Hakim Suhail Ishtiyaq.
For the Respondent: Mr. B.A. Dar.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY DHAR, J.

1. Petitioner has called into question report dated 25.06.2003 of Director Land Records, Kashmir (respondent No. 3), communication dated 27.06.2003 issued by Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar (respondent No. 2) and order dated 30.06.2003 issued Tehsildar, Kangan (respondent No. 4). Petitioner has also challenged order dated 02.09.2014 passed by Financial Commissioner (Revenue), J&K, Srinagar (respondent No. 1) whereby revision petition preferred by petitioner against the aforesaid three communications/orders has been dismissed. A further direction has been sought upon the respondents restraining them from causing any interference or impediment in the petitioner’s possession over the land measuring 2 kanals 4 marlas covered under Khasra No. 261 and 36 kanals 13 marlas under Khasra No. 262 situated at Estate Sonamarg.

2. Petitioner claims to be owner in possession of aforesaid land for the last more than five decades through his predecessors-in-interest. It is averred that presently it is the petitioner who is in possession of the land in question which is recorded as “Shamilati Jaiz” and “State land”. Petitioner goes on to submit that on the basis of some false a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top