SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 50

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Pankaj Mithal, C.J. and Rajnesh Oswal, J.
Aman Satya Kachroo Trust – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K and Others – Respondent
WP(C) PIL No.45 of 2019
Decided on : 29-8-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant (s): Prof. Rajendar Kumar Kachroo present in person
For the Respondent (s): Sh. Suraj Singh, GA and Sh. Feroz Ahmad Sheikh, Dy. AG (through virtual mode)

The forum of PIL should be used only for protecting basic human rights of the weak and marginalized persons and not for improving the Government system or the drawbacks in the implementation of any scheme.

Headnote:

PIL - Women Welfare Schemes - OSC, WHL - Clauses 10-14 of the guidelines for OSC implementation provide for steps to be taken by State Governments, formulation of Management Committee, functions of the Management Committee, and grievance redressal mechanism. Court found that the petitioner's personal commercial interest was involved in initiating the PIL and dismissed the petition.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Trust, filed a PIL seeking direction for the constitution of a committee to provide guidance for the implementation of women welfare schemes in Jammu and Kashmir. The petitioner alleged non-implementation of the schemes and sought to make submissions before the Ministry of Women and Child Development.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's personal commercial interest was involved in initiating the PIL and dismissed the petition. The court also observed that the forum of PIL should be used only for protecting basic human rights of the weak and marginalized persons and not for improving the Government system or the drawbacks in the implementation of any scheme.

Issues: The main issues were the non-implementation of women welfare schemes in Jammu and Kashmir and the petitioner's entitlement to maintain a petition in public interest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's personal commercial interest in the establishment of OSCs in Jammu and Kashmir and having competitive interest did not entitle them to maintain a petition like this in public interest. The court also emphasized that the forum of PIL should be used for protecting basic human rights of the weak and marginalized persons.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner's personal commercial interest was involved in initiating the PIL and that the petition lacked merit.

Order :

Pankaj Mithal, C.J.-

A committee constituted under the Chairmanship of Justice J. S. Verma (former Chief Justice of India) in the wake of Nirbaya’s Case made certain recommendations especially for formulating the Schemes to provide women with,

    (i) access to justice;

(ii) access to Government services; and

(iii) access to welfare schemes of the Central Government and State Government both.

All these schemes were to be funded fully by the Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD) from out of ‘Nirbaya Fund’.

2. Accordingly, integrated Schemes, a Women Helpline (WHL) and One Stop Centre (OSC) came into existence. The Apex Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 565 of 2013 ‘Nipun Saxena v. Union of India’ recognized and underlined the importance of OSC and had expressed desire to set up OSC in every district of all States/Union Territories.

3. The petitioner is a Trust alleged to have been registered in Delhi in the year 2009. The said Trust through its founder trustee Professor Rajendar Kumar Kachroo has preferred this writ petition in public interest seeking direction of this court for the constitution of a committee under the Chairmanship of the Chairperson of the State Legal Service Authority to provide directions and guidance to the Department of Social Welfare J&K, in the matter of implementation of all women related schemes in Jammu and Kashmir, particularly, WHL and OSC. Secondly, for direction to the Ministry of Women and Child Development to assess whether the schemes of WHL and OSC in Jammu and Kashmir are being implemented as per the guidelines and lastly to allow the petitioner to make submissions before the Ministry of Women and Child Development in context of implementation of the above two schemes in J&K.

4. The petitioner alleges that the guidelines of the schemes provide for a cross departmental monitoring committee to be constituted under the Chairmanship of the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, but till date no such Committee has been constituted with the result that the schemes are not being implemented in the proper manner. It is averred that the Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India, is the architect of the Schemes WHL and OSC and provides for the guidelines of their implementation. The aforesaid schemes are to be implemented by the Department of Women and Child Development, J&K. The petitioner admits that WHL and seven OSCs in the districts of Jammu, Srinagar, Kathua, Doda, Rajouri, Anantnag and Kupwara are operational in J&K. Out of these OSCs, the petitioner is managing the OSC’s at Jammu and Srinagar whereas four separate Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) have been selected to operate the OSCs of Kathua, Doda, Anantnag and Kupwara. The OSC of Rajouri is operated by district administration. Similarly, the OSC established at Bandipora (now closed down) and that of Samba are also being managed by the district administration. There are no OSCs in other twelve districts of Union Territory. The grievance of the petitioner is that in twelve districts of Jammu and Kashmir, OSCs have not been made operational for the past over three years since the scheme was launched. The quality of six out of eight operational OSCs is very poor and is not up to the standard. The implementation work of the scheme has been high jacked by the NGOs and they are not implementing them as per the designed features of the scheme. The respondents are not supposed to handover the responsibility of establishment of OSC to the district administration.

5. In pursuance to the order dated 24th December 2021 passed by this court requiring respondent no.1 and 2 to file response if they are satisfied with the implementation of the above scheme in J&K and, if not, how to go about improving the same, respondents no. 1 and 2 have filed response/status report stating that the petitioner is claiming establ

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top