In The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu
Mohna Lal, J.
Sunny Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K through Principal Secretary and Others –Respondent
CRM(M) No.493/2021 and CrlM No.1606/2021
Decided on : 4-7-2022
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Expunction of Adverse Remarks – Petitioner as I/O of case, in his best wisdom, has collected all material/evidence during investigation conducted by him and has placed all relevant evidence before Trial Court in form of charge-sheet – It was duty of Trial Court to evaluate/assess entire evidence on record and to prima-facie come to conclusion whether accused persons can be prima-facie charged/discharged for commission of offences indicted against them in charge-sheet – Having regard to limited controversy of passing an order regarding charge/discharge of accused persons in case in hand, it was not at all necessary for trial Court to have passed/recorded such harsh/disparaging remarks against petitioner (being I/O of case) in his impugned order – Harsh or disparaging remarks are not to be made against persons and authorities whose conduct comes into consideration before courts unless heard – It is general principle of highest importance to proper administration of justice that derogatory remarks are not to be made against persons unless absolutely necessary for decision of case to animadvert on their conduct – In case in hand, trial judge was to pass/record an order on charge/discharge of accused persons, and it was not absolutely necessary for him that conduct of petitioner was necessary for decision of charge/discharge of accused – Derogatory remarks made/recorded against petitioner to stand expunged from impugned order under challenge. (Paras 6 and 7)
Judgment :
Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court in terms of Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer for calling the record of Criminal Challan/FIR No. 25-Sessions titled State of J&K Vs. Bashir Ahmed and ors. from the Court of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge Jammu (Special Judge u/ss22 of NIA Act) and for expunging the adverse remarks, observations and directions made by the Ld. Judge in order dated 02.06.2021 against the petitioner at page No. 15, 16 & 17 of the order dated 02-06-2021 and for quashing/setting aside the impugned adverse remarks and observations made against the petitioner on the following grounds:—
(ii) that the petitioner is a direct recruit in J&K Police and has been appointed to the post of Dy. Superintendent of Police and was posted as Dy. Superintendent of Police (HQ) Kishtwar, and while serving as Dy. SP (HQ) Kishtwar, the petitioner was assigned the investigations in case FIR No. 268 of 2019 of Police Station Kishtwar for offences u/ss 13/18/19/20/38/39 of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act r/w Sections 3/25, 7/25 & 7/27 of Arms Act and case FIR No. 01/2020 registered with Police Station Dachhan Kishtwar for offences u/ss 13/18/19/38/39 of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act r/w sections 3/25 & 7/25 Arms Acts;
(iii) that in case FIR No. 268/2019 of Police Station Kishtwar, an information was received on 02.12.2019 from reliable source that a militant namely Tariq Hussain S/o Mohd. Amin Wani R/o Sounder Dachhan had joined a band militant organization and had made a hideout near Ikhala Forest where he has kept arms and ammunition with the intention to disrupt the peaceful environment of Kishtwar and to secede the Union Territory of J&K from India, the accused persons always remained in lurk to attack the integrity and threatening the sovereignty of the Nation, on this report, the aforesaid FIR was registered and investigation was assigned to the petitioner;
(iv) that in case FIR No. 01/2020 of Police Station Dachhan, the brief facts are, that on 02.01.2020 it was reliably learnt at Police Station Dachhan that as many as 10 accused persons namely (i) Mohd. Hassan s/o Dulla Gujjar R/O Gujjar Kothan Dachhan, (ii) Saddam Hussain Wani S/O Mohd Amin Wani R/O Suid Dachhan, (iii) Ghulam Nabi Chopan S/O Abdul Aziz Chopan R/O Trungaie Dachhan, (iv) Bashir Ahmed Mangnoo S/O Lal Din Magnoo R/O Khripakhnoo Dachhan, (v) Wali Mohd. Sheikh S/O Ghulam Mohd Sheikh R/O Sewarbatti Dachhan, (vi) Mohd. Ramzan Sheikh S/O Mit Zaman Sheikh R/O Sewarbatti Dachhan, (vii) Yasir Hussasin S/O Gul Mohd Dar R/O Sewarbatti Dachhan, (viii) Khazer Mohd. Sheikh S/O Habib Sheikh R/O Sewarbatti Dachhan, (ix) Bashir Ahmed Sheikh S/O Abdul Gani Sheikh R/O Sewarbatti Dachhan & (x) Zahoor Ahmed Butt S/O Sannaullah Butt R/O Lorna Dachhan through underground network are associated with banned organization Hizbul Muzahideen (HM) and the said persons are harboring and providing
Adverse judicial remarks against an Investigating Officer cannot be made without granting an opportunity for hearing, violating natural justice principles.
Disparaging remarks against an Investigating Officer must meet a triple test of fairness, evidence, and necessity for the case's resolution.
The High Court has inherent jurisdiction to expunge remarks made by itself or lower courts to secure justice, but this power is to be exercised in exceptional cases only.
The judgment emphasizes the need for judicial restraint and discipline in passing remarks against police officers and investigating agencies, highlighting the importance of exercising caution and con....
The judgment emphasizes the authority of the Station House Officer to seek release of accused under Section 169 Cr.P.C. and the need for restraint in recording non-essential disparaging remarks.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.