SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 361

RAJNESH OSWAL
Narain Dass Bhagwan Dass – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amrish Kapoor
For the Respondent: H.A. Siddiqui

JUDGEMENT/ORDER :

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the complaint filed by the respondent, titled, “State versus M/s. Narayan Dass Bhagwan Dass and others” pending before the court of learned Sub Judge (Special Municipal Magistrate) Jammu, on the following grounds:

    (a) That there is no allegation in the complaint against the present petitioners that can even remotely suggest that the petitioners have committed any offence under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (for short 'the Act').

(b) That in the present complaint there is no allegation in the complaint which would bring the case within the mischief of section 34(2) of the Act.

(c) That the sale of the drugs has been made by the Medical Officer Government Gandhi Nagar Hospital but the respondent No. 1 did not choose to file the complaint against the main accused so in absence of the main accused, it cannot be said that the petitioner has contravened the provisions of the Act.

(d) That the present complaint deserves to be quashed as the petitioner No. 1 has been arrayed as one of the accused but through no body and in the absence of person through whom the firm is to be served, the complaint is not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top