SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SANJEEV KUMAR, MOHAN LAL, J.
M/s Rainawari Finance & Investment Company Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
ITA No.21 of 2014
Decided on : 03-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. K.S.Johal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Supreet Johal, Advocate Mr. Inderjeet Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Aruna Thakur, Advocate

Once a company is dissolved under Section 560(5) of the Companies Act, it ceases to exist, and no valid assessment order could be passed against it.

Headnote:

Section 260A - Income Tax - Companies Act, 1956, Section 560 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956, which allows the Registrar to strike off a defunct company from the register and dissolve it. The court highlighted that a dissolved company can be restored to the register and continued as if its name had not been struck off. The court also emphasized the liability of directors and the possibility of challenging assessment orders by persons held liable for the company's dues.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant company filed a Nil return of income for the assessment year 2004-05. The assessing authority made an addition to the income, and the appellant appealed the decision. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, but the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed it. The appellant argued that the company had been dissolved under Section 560(5) of the Companies Act before the assessment order was passed.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant-company was struck off from the Register of Companies and dissolved before the assessment order was made. The court held that the assessment order against a dissolved company would be a nullity and set aside the order of assessment, the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and the order of the Tribunal.

Issues: The main issue was whether the assessing authority could pass an assessment order against a company that had been dissolved under Section 560(5) of the Companies Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once a company is dissolved under Section 560(5) of the Companies Act, it ceases to exist, and no valid assessment order could be passed against it. The court emphasized the liability of directors and the possibility of challenging assessment orders by persons held liable for the company's dues.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order of assessment, the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and the order of the Tribunal.

JUDGMENT :

SANJEEV KUMAR J.

1. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act of 1961”] is directed against order dated 30.01.2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench [“the Tribunal”] in ITA No.355(ASR)/2013(Assessment year 2004-05). Vide order dated 03.01.2015 instant appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law:-

“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT erred in law in not appreciating that the name of the appellant company had been struck off from the Register of the Companies by the Registrar and the aforesaid company was dissolved under provisions of Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956, prior to the date of passing of the assessment order?

2. The aforesaid substantial question of law has arisen in the background of following factual matrix:

The appellant-Company filed a Nil return of income for the assessment year 2004-05 with the Income Tax Officer Ward No.2 (2), Jammu. The Return of Income also contained a note stating therein that the appellant-Company had filed an application on 19.03.2004 before the Registrar of Companies under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 [“the Companies Act”] for striking off the name of the Company from the Register of the companies under Simplified Exit Scheme. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Income Tax Act”] vide order of the Assessing Authority dated 21.12.2006. The Assessing Authority made an addition of Rs.1,00,75,000/-being the amount of unsecured loans received by the Company during the earlier years and was credited to the Capital Reserve during the previous year. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant-Company filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jammu (headquarters Amritsar) against the order of assessment. The appeal was dismissed by the Ist Appellate Authority vide its order dated 05.02.2008. Second appeal was preferred by the appellant-Company before the Tribunal. The Tribunal vide its order dated 13.08.2010 allowed the appeal and remanded the case back to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to adjudicate the case afresh after complying with necessary requirements of deposit of fee in terms of the relevant provisions of the Act.

On remand, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) after providing an opportunity of being heard to the appellant passed fresh order on 01.04.2013 dismissing the appeal of the appellant-company and confirming the addition made by the assessing authority in the impugned assessment order. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) rejected the contention of the appellant-company that no assessment order could have been passed against the company which had become defunct. It is this order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 01.04.2013, which was assailed by the appellant-company before the Tribunal. The Tribunal concurred with the view of the 1st appellate authority and dismissed the appeal of the appellant-company vide order dated 30.01.2014, which is assailed before us in this appeal.

3. The impugned order is assailed by the appellant on a solitary ground that the assessing authority could not have passed an assessment order against the Company, which, at the time of making of the assessment order, stood dissolved under the provisions of Section 560(5) of the Companies Act.

4. It is argued by Mr. K.S.Johal, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, that on the date of making assessment by the assessing authority the appellant-company had ceased to exist and stood dissolved under Section 560(5) of the Companies Act and a notification in this regard stood published in Government Gazette dated April 22 to April 28, 2006. He, however, fairly concedes that despite the notice with regard to striking off of the Company w.e.f. 31.03.2006 having been published on the date of making assessment, appellant could not bring this fact to the notice of the assessing authority at the time of mak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top