SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 687

MOHD. AKRAM CHOWDHARY
Arish Parvez – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sumant Sudan; Vishal Sharma
For the Respondent: Monika Kohli

JUDGMENT :

MOHD. AKRAM CHOWDHARY, J.

1. Through the medium of the instant petition filed under section 438(1) of Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks bail, in anticipation of his arrest, in case FIR No. 5/2022 registered with Police Station, ACB, (Central), Jammu under section 7 P.C. Act read with Section 120-B IPC.

2. Respondent-Bureau registered the FIR in question against the petitioner upon a complaint purported to have been made by one Harmeet Singh, who had alleged that the petitioner had demanded a sum of Rs. 35,000/- as bribe from him, for issuance of a Fard through one of his tout, namely, Jatin.

3. During the course of the trap laid by the respondent-Bureau, the said Jatin was caught red-handed while demanding and accepting an amount of Rs. 15,000/- as an advance towards the final amount of Rs. 35,000/- Petitioner, however, was neither present on spot at the time of laying a trap by the officials of respondent- Bureau nor had he received the trap money.

4. It has been asserted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has not committed any offence, whatsoever, much less the one alleged in the FIR and the petitioner is stated to have no connection or relation with the accused Jati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top