HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MOHD. YOUSUF WANI, J
DALEEP RAINA – Appellant
Versus
UT OF J AND K TH. S.H.O. POLICE STATION NAGROTA JAMMU AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CRM(M)
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - The petitioner seeks to quash FIR No. 290/2023 registered based on a purported false complaint by the respondent, amidst ongoing civil litigation regarding land disputes - The petitioner claims potential irreparable harm to reputation due to the criminal case - The court stays the presentation of the final report pending further hearings. (Paras 3, 5, 7)
(B) Interim Relief - The court acknowledges the need for interim relief to prevent irreparable loss to the petitioner while the matter is under consideration. (Paras 5, 7)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner is involved in a civil dispute over land with the respondent, who has filed a criminal complaint leading to the FIR in question. The petitioner argues that the FIR is based on false allegations and seeks to prevent further legal consequences.
Findings of Court:
The court recognizes the potential harm to the petitioner’s reputation and stays the final report's presentation until the next hearing.
Issues: The primary issue is whether the FIR should be quashed based on the allegations of it being false and the ongoing civil litigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes the importance of protecting an individual's reputation from irreparable harm while considering the merits of the case.
Result: The presentation of the final report is stayed until the next hearing.
ORDER :
1. Issue notice to the respondents in the main petition as well as in the interim application for filing response/objections, if any, returnable within a period of four weeks. Steps for service to be taken within a period of two weeks.
2. Notice against respondent No. 2 for service through registered post shall be entrusted to the respondent No. 1 for execution and report.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who submitted that the FIR No. 290/2023 registered with Police Station, Nagrota, Jammu and the preceding order dated 11.07.2023 of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Passenger Tax Court) Jammu, sought to be quashed stand registered/passed respectively on the basis of a false and fictitious complaint made by the respondent No. 2, under concealment of facts.
4. It is submitted that a civil litigation is going on between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2 in respect of the subject matter of the dispute i.e. land measuring 14 Kanals falling under survey Nos. 163 and 164 situated at revenue estate Sidhra, Jammu. It is also alleged that a Housing Cooperative Society purchased the aforementioned quantum of land through sale deeds and agreements from the attorney holder of the father of the respondent No. 2 and the petitioner has been illegally involved in the criminal case as being the Chief Executive Officer of the Society. It is also submitted that earlier a petition bearing No. 612/2023 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure came to be filed by the petitioner which was subsequently withdrawn by him vide order dated 29.05.2024 upon knowing that the FIR which was sought to be not registered in that petition, had been already registered. That this Court granted liberty to the petitioner while withdrawing the said petition to file a fresh petition, if and when needed, with a further direction to the respondent No. 1 that he should not present the final report in the FIR in question without the orders of the Court within a period of one week.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner shall suffer a great irreparable loss in terms of his reputation and adverse consequences on account of the criminal case against him, if the investigation in the same is not stayed. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner having a prima facie case is sure to succeed in the main petition which has been filed with a prayer for quashment of the FIR in question.
6. List on 31.08.2024 .
7. In the meantime, subject to any vacation or modification upon consideration of the objections/arguments of the other side, presentation of final report (challan), if any, warranted in the case, is stayed till next date of hearing before the Bench.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by a criminal court, and the ingredients of the alleged offences must be made out for an FIR to be susta....
The court emphasized that the continuation of a criminal proceeding would constitute an abuse of process of the court when the FIR lacked the essential elements of the alleged offence.
A civil dispute can involve criminal elements, and allegations of criminal trespass warrant legal proceedings despite claims of civil nature.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.