SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 370

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Rana Subodh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct sub-group of writ petition as W.R (S) with new No. 2309 of 2001.

2. The office, particularly Computer Section is directed to correct the same.

3. The petitioner was in the services of the State and retired from the post of Accountant, Animal Husbandry Department. While he was in the services, the petitioner was suspended on 4.2.1996 and continued under suspension till he retired on 30.4.1998. He was paid subsistence allowance during the aforesaid period in the old scale of pay and after superannuation he received full payment of G.P.F., Group Insurance but 90% of the pension, gratuity and leave encashment amount.

4. In the aforesaid background, the petitioner has prayed for direction on the respondents to pay salary of the period of suspension alter adjusting the subsistence allowance in the revised scale as was allowed w.e.f. 1.1.1996 and finalisation of pension gratuity and leave encashment taking into consideration the revised scale as was allowed to the State Government employees w.e.f. 1.1.1996.

5. According to petitioner, no proceeding was initialed while he was in service, nor any proceeding under Ru










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top