SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 385

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
M. K. Refractories – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand State Electricity Board – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. This application has been preferred by petitioner M/s. M.K. Refractories for direction on respondents to grant it benefit of clause 9.6 of the Industrial Policy, 1995 which inter alia provides that the industries coming into production between 1.9.1995 and 31.8.2000 shall be entitled for exemption from payment of minimum guarantee charges, if the connected load is upto 500 KVA.

2. Further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to refund the entire amount of minimum guarantee charges, earlier realised in terms of judgment of Supreme Court in the case of M/s. K.D. Industries v. Blhar State Electricity Board, reported in 2001 (1) JLJR 678 (SC): 2001 (2) JCR 318 (SC).

3. The petitioner claims to be a L.T. consumer of respondents J.S.E.B. and has set up an industry In the State of Jharkhand for manufacturing of refractories products. It obtained electrical connection on a contract load of 50 H.P. and started production since 5.7.1997. A certificate In support of such claim has also been granted by General Manager. District Industries Centre, Dhan-bad but the Board having not allowed the benefit of exemption as per Industrial Policy, 1995. the petitione















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top