SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 520

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA, D.N.PRASAD
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Johan Shah @ Md. Jahan – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal by the Insurance Company is against the Award and judgment passed by the 4th Addl. Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, dated 10.2.1995, whereby a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- with interest, initially at the rate of 10% per annum and later on at the rate of 10%, has been awarded in favour of the respondent No. 1 and against the appellant.

2. The case of the respondent No. 1 claimant before the Tribunal was that he had received injuries because of an accident, which occurred on 22.4.1990. In this appeal, we are not concerned with any question relating to the occurrence of the accident as such or whether the accident occurred because of the rashness and negligence on the part of the driver of the vehicle. That is not an issue for adjudication before us in this appeal.

3. The limited issue raised for our adjudication by the appellant-Insurer is with respect to the determination of the quantum of compensation based on the assessment as per the learned Tribunal with regard to the alleged injury allegedly sustained by the respondent No. 1 and the alleged disablement suffered by him on account of, and as a result of the accident in question. What do we find from perusal of the judgme






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top