SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 563

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Lalit Mohan Roy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The petitioner was in the services of the State, being aggrieved against the order dated 2nd December, 2000 contained in Memo No. 2820, has preferred this writ petition.

2. By the order dated 2nd December, 2000 the appointment of petitioner made in the year 1967 has been cancelled after about 33 years of service.

3. The petitioner was appointed as Junior Statistical Supervisor on temporary basis by an order contained in Memo No. 645 dated 1st February, 1967 issued by Director. Directorate of Statistical and Evaluation. Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. During the service period he was transferred from one place to other and was lastly posted in the office of District Statistical Officer, Dumka.

4. According to petitioner, he continued in the services of the State without any break and was to superannuate from service in the midst of 2001. About six months prior to his retirement the Director, Statistics and Evaluation Directorate. Planning Department. Government of Bihar issued impugned Memo No. 2820 dated 2nd December, 2000 and cancelled his appointment.

5. It was alleged that the order of appointment was cancelled not only six months prior t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top