SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Uphar Picture Palace – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court – Respondent
S.M. Mukhopadhaya, J.
1. This application has been preferred by petitioner, M/s. Uphar picture Palace against the order dated 6.8.1999 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi, in B.S. Case No. 11/97. The application under Section 26(2) of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act filed by the respondent, Shankar Karmakar against the order of dismissal was allowed and he was reinstated with full back wages/compensation.
2. The brief fact of the case is that M/s. Uphar Picture Palace is carrying on business of exhibition of cinema shows, a place of public entertainment. It engaged several persons including respondent, Shankar Karmakar who was working since 1975 as operator. A departmental proceeding was initiated against him by charge-sheet dated 28.5.1996 whereinafter the respondent, Shankar Karmakar was dismissed vide order dated 8.5.1997.
3. The respondent, Shankar Karmakar filed a complaint petition under Section 26(2) of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act registered as B.S. Case No. 11/97. Prior to the same he raised industrial dispute and took steps for conciliation proceeding. No. steps having taken by the Management M/s. Uphar Picture Palace, respondent, Sh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.