SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 550

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Uphar Picture Palace – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court – Respondent


ORDER

S.M. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. This application has been preferred by petitioner, M/s. Uphar picture Palace against the order dated 6.8.1999 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi, in B.S. Case No. 11/97. The application under Section 26(2) of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act filed by the respondent, Shankar Karmakar against the order of dismissal was allowed and he was reinstated with full back wages/compensation.

2. The brief fact of the case is that M/s. Uphar Picture Palace is carrying on business of exhibition of cinema shows, a place of public entertainment. It engaged several persons including respondent, Shankar Karmakar who was working since 1975 as operator. A departmental proceeding was initiated against him by charge-sheet dated 28.5.1996 whereinafter the respondent, Shankar Karmakar was dismissed vide order dated 8.5.1997.

3. The respondent, Shankar Karmakar filed a complaint petition under Section 26(2) of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act registered as B.S. Case No. 11/97. Prior to the same he raised industrial dispute and took steps for conciliation proceeding. No. steps having taken by the Management M/s. Uphar Picture Palace, respondent, Sh
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top