The Court

1. This application was preferred by petitioner against the order contained in Memo No. 403 dated 5.5.2000 whereby and whereunder the pension of petitioner was fixed at lower stage of Rs. 6950/- per month instead of Rs. 7700/- as was approved by the District Accounts Officer on 25.2.2000. The other order issued by the D.S.E., Deoghar vide Memo No. 532 dated 10.2.2001 was also challenged by which the headmaster of the school was directed to prepare recovery chart of excess amount as was paid in favour of petitioner since 1.4.1989.

2. The petitioner alleged mala fide against Sri Arjun Mahto, clerk of D.S.E. Office, Deoghar, apart from arbitrary action alleged on the part of D.S.E., Deoghar.

3. In pursuance of the Courts order, the D.S.E. Deoghar, namely, Smt. Nirmala Kumari Barlia and Sri Arjun Mahto, clerk were present in Court on 8.8.2001 and informed the court that they will look into the matter and if necessary, will issue appropriate order.

4. In the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of D.S.E., Deoghar, it is alleged that the, pension of petitioner was wrongly fixed Rs. 7700/- and subsequently, a letter has been sent to the Accountant General, Bihar to the effec