SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 703

GURUSHARAN SHARMA
Balbharan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bani Chatterjee – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Gurusharan Sharma, J.

1. Plaintiffs are appellants, who have lost their suit in the trial Court.

2. Title Suit No. 127 of 1970 was filed for declaration of title and confirmation of possession over the suit land, described in Schedule D to the plaint and for permanent injunction restraining defendants from interfering with their possession over the same.

3. According to plaintiffs, their ancestor. Jitnarain Singh left behind two sons. Gajadhar Singh and Nepal Singh. Gajadhar Singh died leaving behind two sons, Laru Singh and Bhakta Singh. Laru Singh died issueless. Bhakta Singh had a son. Lachhmi Singh. Plaintiffs 1 to 3 were sons of Lachhmi Singh and plaintiff No. 4 was his widow. Nepal Singh had a son Shibu Singh. Shamu Singh was son of Shibu Singh, who left behind two sons, Chepa @ Chamtu Singh and Etwari Singh. Chamtu Singh died issueless in 1931. Etwari Singh also died unmarried in 1935. After death of Etwari Singh, interest of both sons of Shamu Singh devolved upon Lachhmi Singh, who was the only surviving male member amongst the descendants of Jitnarain Singh. He sold some lands to Budhu Mahto and Beni Mahto and died in the year 1935. All of a sudden on 3.7.1970, defend















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top