SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 207

GURUSHARAN SHARMA
Most. Badama Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lakshman Sharma @ Pancham Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Gurusharan Sharma, J.

1. Ramlal Khubi Sharma had two sons, namely, Jadunandan Sharma and Ramlaxman Sharma, alias Pancham Singh. Jadunandan Sharma filed Title Suit No. 34 of 1983 against his brother for eviction from the Suit Holding No. 110 situated in new Sitaramdera Basti in Jamshedpur town, detailed in Schedule A to the plaint under the provision of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982.

2. Plaintiff claimed to have purchased the suit holding in a Courts auction sale exclusively and thereafter inducted the defendant-tenant therein. Defendant claimed his half share in the suit holding and his possession as co-sharer.

3. The suit was decreed in part holding that the plaintiff was the absolute owner of Suit Holding No. 110 and defendant being his younger brother was living therein not as a tenant but as a licencee with his consent, which stood terminated by notice (Exhibit 2) sent by the plaintiff asking him to vacate and thereafter defendant was to be treated as trespasser. Trial Court also observed that since the question of title and ownership has already been held in favour of plaintiff in the present suit, he should not be driven to file another


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top