SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 742

M.Y.EQBAL
Anand Timber – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the letter dated 7.9,2001 and 12.12.2001 issued by respondent Nos. 3 and 4, namely, Conservator of Forest, Deoghar Circle, Deoghar and the Divisional Forest Officer, Deoghar, whereby the application for renewal of licence of Saw Mill has been rejected.

2. Petitioners case is that in 1996, he had applied for grant of licence for Saw Mill and after due inquiry that the Saw Mill situated outside the forest area a licence was granted in 1997. The said licence being registration No. 1/97 was time to time renewed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Deoghar. All of a sudden in 2001 petitioner was directed by respondent No. 4 to produce all the documents in relation to his Saw Mill. Petitioner produced all the documents. However, suddenly respondent No. 4 refused to renew the licence and directed the petitioner to stop the Saw Mill.

3. Respondent No. 4 in his counter affidavit has stated that petitioner was granted licence for the Saw Mill in Deoghar township in 1997 after the ban imposed by the Supreme Court for grant of fresh Saw Mill licence. It is stated that Government of Bihar also took a policy decisio











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top