SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 878

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Maya Fuel Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The writ petition has been preferred by petitioner. M/s. Maya Fuel Pvt. Ltd. for an appropriate writ or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to immediately allocate and supply 2139 M.T. coal to the petitioner from October, 2001 onwards as per its coal linkage contained in letter No. CIL/CAA/48912/ENHANCEMENT/23-27 dated 21st September, 1998 issued by the office of M/s. Coal India Limited (CIL for short) and balance quantity of coal from March, 2000 to September, 2001 in view of the fact that similarly situated persons are being allocated and supplied such coal pursuant to their coal linkage.

2. The Respondent, M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL for short) have not denied the petitioners claim for supply of coal, but opposed the quantity of supply as prayed for. According to it, the linked consumers are entitled to lift coal as per Maxim Permissible Quantity (MPQ for short) as introduced by subsidiary companies of M/s. CIL.

3. The stand of CIL is similar. According to it, the policy of sale and distribution of coal to non-core sector was deliberated in great details in the 5th CMDs meet, held on 2nd of June, 2001 which was approved













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top