SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 1242

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Urmila Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The husband of petitioner the Bachhan Ram was in the services of the State as choukidar in the Work Charge Establishment of Public Health and Engineering Department, P.H. Division at Ramgarh. He died in harness on 1st August 2001. Thereafter, the respondents having not paid the total retiral benefits to the widow and the case of the son having not considered for compassionate appointment, the present writ petition has been preferred.

2. As the respondents took plea that the husband of petitioner was not in the regular establishment, the petitioner has also prayed to command the respondents to regularize and confirm the service of her husband, late Bachhan Ram he having worked for 21 years under the State.

3. 11 appears that the husband of petitioner was a daily wager in the Biswas Board Division, Hazaribagh of Public Health and Engineering Department. He was appointed as choukidar in the scale of Rs. 155-190 in the Work Charged Establishment vide memo No. 674 dated 25th April, 1980. But before his service was taken in the regular establishment he died.

4. The respondent No. 2, Executive Engineer, P.H. Division, Hazaribagh has taken plea that as the petitio













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top