SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 671

Jharkhand High Court
Vinod Kumar Gupta,Tapen Sen, JJ.
Sanju Kumari - Appellant
Versus
Rahim Ansari - Respondent
MA 174 Of 2001
Decided On : 20 June, 2002

Headnote:Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 – Section 140, 166 and 173 – Owner of the offending vehicle held liable to pay the award amount – vehicle being insured, liability of insurer to pay the award amount not in dispute – amount to be paid by insurer to the claimant – appeal allowed. (Paras 2 to 4)

ORDER

1. What is under challenge in this appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act is that part of the order dated 24.7.2001, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Godda in Title Claim Case No. 20 of 2000, whereby it has fastened the liability to pay the award amount under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act upon the appellant, who is the owner of the vehicle in question. The sole contention of the appellant is that the vehicle in question having been duly insured with the respondent No. 3 (The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Godda Branch), the liability to pay the award amount is vested with the insurer.

2. Mr. ALok Lal, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 does not dispute the fact that the vehicle in question was insured and that therefore, the insurer also cannot dispute that indeed the liability to pay the amount of award under Section 140 could not have been fastened upon the appellant owner.

3. This appeal is allowed. The aforesaid impugned part of the order dated 24.7,2001 is hereby set aside with a direction that the amount in question shall be paid by the respondent No. 3 (The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Godda Branch) to the claimant.

4. This judgment, however, shall not have any influencing factor insofar as the disposal of the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is concerned. It shall be heard and disposed of on its own merits.

5. The amount deposited by the appellant in this Court shall be returned to the Tribunal for disbursement of the claim.

6. The appeal is allowed.

7. No order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top