SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 1255

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Venudhar Mahanti – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The petitioner has challenged the order contained in Memo No. 52 dated 11th February, 2002 whereby and whereunder it has been ordered to retire the petitioner w.e.f. 31st January, 2002 having completed 40 years of service.

2. Admittedly, no rule/guide line has been prescribed by the State for superannuation of a Government employee on completion of 40 years of service. The age of superannuation has been prescribed under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code in terms of which a person stands retired on attaining 58 years of age. There is nothing on the record to suggest that any rule or guide line was in vogue prescribing minimum age of 18 years when the petitioner was appointed on 1st February, 1962.

3. Similar case fell for consideration before the Patna High Court in Mokhtar Ahmad v. B.S.R.T.C., reported in 1995 (I) PLJR 183. The Patna High Court taking into consideration the provisions of Rules 54 and 73 of the Bihar Service Code, held that an employee stands superannuated only on attaining the age of superannuation and cannot be retired on the ground of completion of 40 years of service.

4. Same view has been taken by this Court in the case of Kalanand Jha



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top