SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 110

TAPEN SEN
Lali Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

Tapen Sen, J.

1. Heard Mr. Rajeev Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradip Modi, learned G.P.I, for the respondents.

2. Whether the resolution/notification No. 6394 dated 23.10.1987 can be applied upon the petitioner is the moot question that has to be decided in this case.

3. According to the petitioners, by an order dated 9.7.1980 the Chief Engineer. National High Ways Project terminated the services of several employees including the petitioner and thereafter by order dated 4.4.1981 issued by the Chief Engineer, Public Works Department. National High Ways as contained at Annexure 2, the retrenched staff including the petitioner were taken back in service. The name of the husband of the Petitioner No. 1 (and father of the Petitioner No. 2), namely, Ajay Kumar Sinhas name was mentioned at SI. No. 1 of running page 31 of this Writ Application.

4. On 5.4.1984 by Annexure 5 a letter was issued under the signature of the Joint Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna addressed to the Accountant General, Bihar through the Department of Finance, wherein it was inter alia informed that pursuant to the demands raised by the PWD Mazdoor Union, it














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top