SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 135

M.Y.EQBAL
Dwarika Sonar – Appellant
Versus
Most Bilguli – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. The defendants are the appellants. The appeal is against the judgment of reversal. The plaintiffs-respondents filed a suit for declaration of title over the suit land and also for declaration that the revisional survey entry of the name of defendant no 1 in respect of the suit land is wrong and erroneous. The suit was dismissed by the Munsif, Koderma being title suit No. 27/84 holding that the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief.

2. The appellate court reversed the judgment in Title appeal. No. 42/88, set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court and decreed the suit.

3. Plaintiffs case is that he is the settled raiyait of village Jainagar having ancestral land and house. The suit land under khata No. 222 stands in the name of Guli Sonar and Meghan Sonar, father and uncle of the plaintiff which was duly recorded in the cadastral survey record of rights. The recorded tenant, Meghan Sonar died issueless and the entire property of khata No. 222 devolved upon his brother, Guli Sonar, the father of the plaintiff. After the death of the father of the plaintiff the land of khata No. 222 alleged to have devolved upon him being the sole and rightful owner a















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top