SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 400

GURUSHARAN SHARMA, HARI SHANKAR PRASAD
New India Assurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Devi – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard. Insurance Company has filed the present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the impugned judgment and award dated 19.6.2002, passed by Motor Vehicles Claim Tribunal, Bokaro, in Title M.V. Case No. 51 of 1998, whereby insurer was directed to indemnify owners liability to pay compensation of Rs. 2,74,000/-. On 28.9.1998 the truck (BR-17-0431) loaded with coils developed a snag on the way. The owner of the truck asked the driver to change its wheel with the help of jack. The jack was not working properly. In the meantime, another truck (BEV-8058) came there and on request its driver, Ashok Kumar Sah came down to assist in changing the defective wheel. While doing so unfortunately the said truck turned turtle and fell down crushing the leg and waist of Ashok Kumar Sah. He was taken to hospital, where he was declared dead.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that since accident did not take place due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle, the Insurance Company cannot be held liable to pay any amount of compensation. Owner of the truck knowing fully well that jack was defective and faulty insisted the driver to use the sam



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top