SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 463

TAPEN SEN
Sarita Narayan – Appellant
Versus
H. E. C. Through Chairman-Cum-Managing Director Head Quarter – Respondent


ORDER

Tapen Sen, J.

1. When this case was called out, Mr. R. Mukhopadhya, learned counsel for the Respondents submitted that he has filed two Supplementary Affidavits pursuant to the order dated 27.03.2003 but due to complete inadvertence, the number of both Supplementary Affidavits has been wrongly mentioned. In the mean time he prays that he may be allowed to make the necessary corrections. He may do so during the course of the day.

2. Heard Mr. A. Allam, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. R. Mukhopadhya, learned counsel for the Respondents.

3. The Writ Petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 19.09.2001 as contained at Annexure-5 passed by the manager (P and A)/Head Quarters by which on the basis of the pre employment medical examination report dated 15.08.1977, the date of birth of the Petitioner was accepted as 15.07.1945.

4. The Petitioner has further prayed that the Respondents be directed to accept the date of birth of the Petitioner as 15.09.1948, i.e. the date on which the Respondents always acted upon because, i.e. the date as recorded in the Matriculation Certificate (School Leaving Certificate) Consequently the Petitioner prayed that the Respondents should







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top