SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 616

VISHNUDEO NARAYAN, LAKSHMAN URAON
Suresh Prasad Sao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vishnudeo Narayan, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant named above against the impugned judgment and order dated 23.7.1997 passed in S.T. No. 345 of 1989 by Shri Dhruv Narain Upadhyay, 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Giridih whereby and whereunder the appellant was found guilty for the offence punishable Under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo RI for life. However, co-accused Karu Sao was found not guilty and acquitted of the said charge.

2. The prosecution case has arisen on the basis of the Fardbeyan (Ext. 5) of P.W, 1. Narain Sah, the informant and father of Kanti Devi, the deceased of this case recorded by AST Rama Shankar Singh of Hirodih on 30.12.1987 at 15.30 hours regarding the occurrence which is said to have taken place between 26th December, 1987 and 30th December, 1987 at village Mukunriih in which the dowry death of Kanti Devi aforesaid was committed. The case was instituted by drawing of the formal FIR (Ext. 4) on that very day at 16.00 hours which was received in the Court empowered to take cognizance on the following day

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that Kanti Devi, the deceased of this


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top