SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 587

M.Y.EQBAL
Shyam Sundar – Appellant
Versus
Parbati Devi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. This second appeal filed by the defendants/appellants is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19.12.1988 passed by the 1st Additional District Judge, Giridih in Title Appeal No. 13/1977 whereby he has dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment and decree dated 12.7.1977 passed by Munsif Giridih in Title Suit No. 17/76.

2. The appeal was admitted for hearing on the following substantial question of law :

"Whether in absence of the heirs of Sheonath Mukherjee, one of the parties in whose favour the appellant-defendants had agreed to reconvey the property, the suit could have been decreed for the whole of the property.

3. The facts of the case lie in a narrow campass.

4. Two persons namely, Shambhunath Mukherjee and Sheonath Mukherjee who were the owners of the suit property sold it to the defendants for a consideration of Rs. 1,000/- and Rs. 3,500/- through two separate sale deeds dated 22.6.1973 and put them in possession of the same. On the same day defendants agreed to their vendors and entered into a deed of reconveyance of the suit property on payment of consideration money within a period of four years from the date of the sale. The defendants




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top